<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Component Development at London MMUG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/04/11/component-development-at-london-mmug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/04/11/component-development-at-london-mmug/</link>
	<description>An infrequent look at developments in the world of the Flash Platform</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: FlashGen</title>
		<link>http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/04/11/component-development-at-london-mmug/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>FlashGen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/04/11/component-development-at-london-mmug/#comment-468</guid>
		<description>Now that sounds like a plan m8...Plus Rich should be coming along for this one :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that sounds like a plan m8&#8230;Plus Rich should be coming along for this one :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Eccles</title>
		<link>http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/04/11/component-development-at-london-mmug/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Eccles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/04/11/component-development-at-london-mmug/#comment-467</guid>
		<description>I don't much of this deep flash geekery, i'm a surface level kind of guy. But maybe we can discuss our very cool upcoming Flex project and show you the "WinBookPro" ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t much of this deep flash geekery, i&#8217;m a surface level kind of guy. But maybe we can discuss our very cool upcoming Flex project and show you the &#8220;WinBookPro&#8221; ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlashGen</title>
		<link>http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/04/11/component-development-at-london-mmug/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>FlashGen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/04/11/component-development-at-london-mmug/#comment-466</guid>
		<description>No it is a good bash worth attending if for nothing else but the social afterwards in the pub - but the talks are usually top (no bragging heheh). Plus you never know you may enjoy the 'Flash geekery' LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it is a good bash worth attending if for nothing else but the social afterwards in the pub - but the talks are usually top (no bragging heheh). Plus you never know you may enjoy the &#8216;Flash geekery&#8217; LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Eccles</title>
		<link>http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/04/11/component-development-at-london-mmug/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Eccles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/04/11/component-development-at-london-mmug/#comment-465</guid>
		<description>Hi Mike,

is it worth me coming? Or will it be horibly Flash geeky?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike,</p>
<p>is it worth me coming? Or will it be horibly Flash geeky?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FlashGen</title>
		<link>http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/04/11/component-development-at-london-mmug/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>FlashGen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/04/11/component-development-at-london-mmug/#comment-420</guid>
		<description>I won't be dealing with backward compatibility to Flash MX. As for clipParameters, I'll try and squeeze in something about it, but I won't be going into too much detail on it for this specific talk.
&lt;p&gt;If it goes well and people are interested I may see if I can do a follow up set of talk(s) covering off those types of topics: clipParameters, meta data, scoped event dispatching, bindings and of course skinning, we'll have to see though&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t be dealing with backward compatibility to Flash MX. As for clipParameters, I&#8217;ll try and squeeze in something about it, but I won&#8217;t be going into too much detail on it for this specific talk.</p>
<p>If it goes well and people are interested I may see if I can do a follow up set of talk(s) covering off those types of topics: clipParameters, meta data, scoped event dispatching, bindings and of course skinning, we&#8217;ll have to see though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scriptkiddie</title>
		<link>http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/04/11/component-development-at-london-mmug/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>scriptkiddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 11:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/04/11/component-development-at-london-mmug/#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Are your components back-compatible with Flash 6? Will you be teaching about the black-magic that is clipParameters etc, or is this is higher level exercise in extending UIObject?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are your components back-compatible with Flash 6? Will you be teaching about the black-magic that is clipParameters etc, or is this is higher level exercise in extending UIObject?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
