<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Universal-ly annoying - Mactel Flash player 9</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/06/06/universal-ly-annoying-mactel-flash-player-9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/06/06/universal-ly-annoying-mactel-flash-player-9/</link>
	<description>An infrequent look at developments in the world of the Flash Platform</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 21:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: FlashGen.Com .: blog :. &#187; No native MacTel Flash 9 player but a solution&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/06/06/universal-ly-annoying-mactel-flash-player-9/#comment-4881</link>
		<dc:creator>FlashGen.Com .: blog :. &#187; No native MacTel Flash 9 player but a solution&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/06/06/universal-ly-annoying-mactel-flash-player-9/#comment-4881</guid>
		<description>[...] Adobe have got a short term solution for all of us Intel based Mac users. As John Dowdell noted on my last post about no universal binary for player 9, we will have to wait a while for that to materialize. In the meantime though there is a way to get the PowerPC version to install and run. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Adobe have got a short term solution for all of us Intel based Mac users. As John Dowdell noted on my last post about no universal binary for player 9, we will have to wait a while for that to materialize. In the meantime though there is a way to get the PowerPC version to install and run. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dowdell</title>
		<link>http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/06/06/universal-ly-annoying-mactel-flash-player-9/#comment-3382</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dowdell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 17:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flashgen.com/2006/06/06/universal-ly-annoying-mactel-flash-player-9/#comment-3382</guid>
		<description>I feel for you, but from all I've seen the existing Mac and Win codebases will indeed get updated first, and won't be held up for the new coding efforts for Intel Macs and Linux. The newer platforms are on the way, but the majority platforms are faster to complete and won't be delayed, sorry. 

Once we get past this cycle, with its porting of development tools before code can be ported, then I think things will move a bit more smoothly on Macs. That knowledge is no real help during this introductory period, though, I realize. :(

jd/adobe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel for you, but from all I&#8217;ve seen the existing Mac and Win codebases will indeed get updated first, and won&#8217;t be held up for the new coding efforts for Intel Macs and Linux. The newer platforms are on the way, but the majority platforms are faster to complete and won&#8217;t be delayed, sorry. </p>
<p>Once we get past this cycle, with its porting of development tools before code can be ported, then I think things will move a bit more smoothly on Macs. That knowledge is no real help during this introductory period, though, I realize. :(</p>
<p>jd/adobe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
