<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flex Builder 3.0 New Design Constraints</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.flashgen.com/2007/11/05/flex-builder-30-new-design-constraints/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.flashgen.com/2007/11/05/flex-builder-30-new-design-constraints/</link>
	<description>An infrequent look at developments in the world of the Flash Platform</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Hayes</title>
		<link>http://blog.flashgen.com/2007/11/05/flex-builder-30-new-design-constraints/#comment-110648</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Hayes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.flashgen.com/2007/11/05/flex-builder-30-new-design-constraints/#comment-110648</guid>
		<description>I must say that I don't care for them either. Especially when you are working with larger components and you have to move your mouse all around the screen. I like the VisualStudio implementation the best so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say that I don&#8217;t care for them either. Especially when you are working with larger components and you have to move your mouse all around the screen. I like the VisualStudio implementation the best so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
